Evaluation of Six Registration Methods for the Human Abdomen on Clinically Acquired CT

August 1, 2016

Zhoubing Xu, Christopher P. Lee, Mattias P. Heinrich, Marc Modat, Daniel Rueckert, Sebastien Ourselin, Richard G. Abramson, and Bennett A. Landman, Vanderbilt University, USA; Universität zu Lübeck, Germany; University College London, UK; Imperial College London, UKTBME014602015_LargeImageThis work evaluates current 3-D image registration tools on clinically acquired abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Thirteen abdominal organs (spleen, right kidney, left kidney, gallbladder, esophagus, liver, stomach, aorta, inferior vena cava, portal and splenic vein, pancreas, right adrenal gland, and left adrenal gland) were manually labeled on a set of 100 CT images, and the 100 labeled images (i.e., atlases) were pairwise registered based on intensity information with six registration tools (FSL, ANTS-CC, ANTS-QUICK-MI, IRTK, NIFTYREG, and DEEDS). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance, and Hausdorff distance were calculated on the registered organs individually. Permutation tests and indifference-zone ranking were performed to examine the statistical and practical significance, respectively. The results suggest that DEEDS yielded the best registration performance. However, due to the overall low DSC values, and substantial portion of low-performing outliers, great care must be taken when image registration is used for local interpretation of abdominal CT. Based on the results shown in this study, many opportunities are open for future investigation and development for a registration tool tailored for abdomen. First, optimization of the registration configurations could potentially improve the registration performances. Second, contributions in abdominal segmentation also provide some hints toward the potential development of abdominal registration algorithms. Third, we see a new direction in fundamental design for the registration method towards the challenging problems in the abdomen through the discrete optimization of DEEDS. Last, we consider that a structured challenge regarding registration in the abdomen using the presented datasets will further boost the development of abdomen-specific and/or general registration algorithms. All data and source code are available so that innovations in registration can be directly compared with the current generation of tools without excessive duplication of effort.

Keywords: image registration, abdomen, computed tomography

Research web page: https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn3193805/wiki/89480

READ FULL ARTICLE ON IEEE XPLORE

Login

New Here? Sign Up

Looking for increased exposure in the field of biomedical engineering? EMBS offers journals, conferences and a community for biomedical engineers. Membership includes PULSE Magazine.

Join EMBS